Expected Value

The Premier League is about to finally kick off.  Still time for that last minute punt on the outright winner.  You will hear a lot of people make predictions on winners from Gary Lineker to Eamonn Dunphy to your mate down the pub.

So why is the smart money on Man City?

Well the information that the pundits usually leave out is how sure they are.  Are they 50% sure?  100% sure?  Before making an informed betting decision you need to know the probability that they will win.  The Football pundits may be experts on football and can easily pick out the strongest team but would struggle to give the probabilities.  They generally are not experts on probability theory.  To get our probabilities we can turn to data analysis projects like bloomberg.  See here for their current league predictions.

The concept of Expected Value can then guide us as to whether it is worth making a bet or not.  The Expected Value of a betting outcome is very easy to calculate because there are only two outcomes - either you win or you lose. 
Expected Value[Payout]= Probability you win * payout for a win + Probability you lose * payout for a lose

The value of a lost bet is obviously zero so the Expected Value simplifies to. 

Expected Value[Payout]= Probability you win * payout for a win 

Any bookmaker site will give us the value of a win.  But finding accurate probabilies is more difficult.  In our example calculations we will use Bloomberg's predictions.  See the table below (odds correct as per 10am on Aug 16th).  Clearly any Expected Value less than €1 is not worth considering since you need at least €1 to cover your stake.


Betting on Man City gives us the highest Expected Value.  Now obviously if you place €1 on Man City you either win €3.75 or you lose, it is not possible to win €1.44 (the expected payout).  Similarly the long run average of a dice roll is 3.5 but you can't roll a 3.5.  The expected value tells us the long run average if you could replay the same Premier League Season over and over.  Each replay could have a different winner due to unpredictable events (injuries, referee decisions, weather, the bounce of the ball, even natural disasters etc).  It is not a guaranteed profit, but it is expected to average out at a profit in the long term if your probabilities are accurate and if you make a enough of these sorts of bets.  

Also to note, although we think that Chelsea are going to edge Man City to the title (they have a slightly higher probability) we are actually going to bet on Man City to win!  This seems like a contradiction but it's not, the bookies are just offering better value on Man City.  So if they do win the payout is bigger and worth it.    

How accurate are bloombergs predictions likely to be?   More details on the prediction can be found on the bloomberg site.  The Man City prediction in particular seems at odds with the bookmakers.  Man Utd and Arsenal are very low in the bloomberg predictions, the bookmakers seem to be predicting a more open title race than the two horse race bloomberg expects.  Does it take into consideration the departure of Luis Suarez, the appointment of Louis Van Gaal, the lack of any exciting arrivals at Man City, the signings of Diego Costa and Alexis Sanchez at Chelsea and Arsenal?  Bloomberg do reveal some details.

"the projections are uniquely data-driven and take into account numerous years of performance for each club, supplemented by the additional value that each club gained from the transfer window."

Numerous years of data should smooth out the David Moyes effect for Man Utd.  It also seems as though they are taking transfer value into account.

Bloomberg also claim:

"Last season BSports ‘Match Analysis’ forecasts proved highly accurate, delivering 14.2% Return on Investment (ROI) on match odds across the Premier League, La Liga and Bundesliga. During the World Cup, ‘Match Analysis’ would have delivered 36.54% ROI on match odds throughout the tournament."


It seems quite legitimate to me and worthy of experimenting with the bloomberg predictions to see if they are in fact the real deal.  I wouldn't be betting the house just yet.  I remain very skeptical, the bookies are proven experts at this game - otherwise they would be out of business.  Some of bloomberg's probabilities are quite far off what the bookies seem to expect.

Very interestingly Man City also have a favourable Expected Value (but only slightly) if we recalculated the expected values based on the probabilities published (on twitter!) from Airton Risk Management aka Paddy Power. It would appear that Paddy Power have taken in so much money on Man Utd, Liverpool and Arsenal that they are willing to offer extremely good value even based on their own risk calculation to attract some money on Chelsea and Man City.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bet Unfair

Image
Read my blog for the tips that bookies do NOT want you to know. The proof is that they continue to restrict my accounts for using the strategies I share here. Betfair have ordered a restriction on my account. So they join the growing list: William Hill Ladbrokes Sky bet Paddy Power Betway Betfred 888sport The list now also includes Coral and 188bet (who still allow me bonuses but is basically unusable thanks to stake restrictions on horses). In betfair's case I received this email - ironically just a couple of hours receiving a separate email inviting me to take part in different promos. With betfair their promotions had been decent but not great. The horse offer was frustrating. Basically you place a bet at 3/1 odds or higher and if he wins then you get a free bet to the same value of your original stake. I stayed clear of this one as 3/1 price had to be the SP. After backing a couple of horses, and and then watching their SP drop to under 3/1 and so missing out
Read more

Deconstructing WDL and O/U 2.5 goals odds.

Input odds below (in decimal): Home Odds: Draw Odds: Away odds: Over 2.5 Odds: Calculate Params See also Elo Reverse Calculator . Dixon Coles Dixon Coles is a method of generating probabilities on football matches.  It is related to Poisson but adds a correlation for low scores.  It seems to be one of the most accurate public methods.  It requires three parameters lambda, mu and rho.  rho describes how related low scores are.  lambda and mu represent the average goals the home and away team are expected to score. In this calculator I have fixed rho = -0.13 (more info here  and here ) and I simply do a brute force search varying lambda and mu to find the values that has the lowest error from the Win Draw Lose and Over 2.5 odds entered.  I use the WDL odds and Over/Under odds as they are the most liquid betting markets and you can usually read a very accurate estimate for these off oddschecker or the exchange.   The solutions (from this brute force search described
Read more

Chrome Extension 1000

Image
Donations now accepted If you have enjoyed using this extension and want to show your appreciation then click "Buy me a coffee" below, otherwise continue further down to read about our features! This started off as just a personal project.  I got full value from the effort that I put in already.   The effort included a few days coding initially and a day or two here or there to fix and add features, perhaps a full working week but fragmented all over the place.  In total it is now about 150 lines of code.   The reward was learning some javascript, learning about chrome extensions, earning some cred on twitter, and getting to connect with different people.  And of course I am actively using it and can identify potential betting opportunities myself. However surprisingly many have found it useful and some have asked for a way to say thanks.  So here it is. Feature Request (01 February 2024) - only available to manually install due to gambling exetnsions being rejected by Chrom
Read more